Maddineni Venkateswarlu v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in a DTAP appeal allowing respondents two weeks to file opposition, directing appellant to file rejoinder, and listing the matter for hearing on 07.08.2023.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 66 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
12.07.2023
Maddinneni Venkateswarlu
… Appellant Vs. State Bank of India & Ors..
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. P.R.S. Sharma , ld. Counsel. For Respondent : Ms. Mekhala Kanji, ld. Counsel Mr. Ayan POddar, ld. Counsel for res. No.10 Mr.Soham Dutta, ld. Adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for respondent no.2 prays for and is granted two weeks time to file opposition with advance copy to the appellant who may file rejoinder within a week thereafter. List the matter on 07.08.2023 for hearing of appeal. Vakalatnama filed by respondent no.2 is taken on record.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Maddinneni Venkateswarlu
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court