Debate Recovery Appellate Tribunal ordered a three-week extension to file a rejoinder to the appeal in a debt recovery matter arising earlier before DRT-2 Hyderabad. An interim order was allowed to continue until the next hearing.
Three weeks time granted to file rejoinder; appeal listed for 18.04.2023; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 53 of 2021
(Arising out of SA 188 of 2021 in DRT- 2 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.02.2023
Karnataka Bank Ltd.,
… Appellant
-VsRavi Prasad Gupta D.
… Respondents
Mr. Anirban Pramanik, ld. Counsel with Mr. S. Dey, ld. counsel for the appellant. None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and granted three weeks time to file rejoinder.
List on 18.04.2023 for hearing appeal.
Interim order passed on 21.11.2022 shall continue till the next date of listing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 13 February, 2023 08/pkb
Karnataka Bank Ltd.
Ravi Prasad Gupta D.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
