The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal that was not pressed by the counsel as the SARFAESI Application had been withdrawn by the respondents, rendering it infructuous.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; impugned order dismissed; pending interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 87 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 215 of 2016 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.02.2023 Bank of Baroda … Appellant -vsMs. S.R. Nirman Private Limited & Another … Respondents
Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the appeal has become infructuous as the Respondents have withdrawn the SARFAESI Application. Learned Counsel does not want to press the instant appeal.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal, being Appeal No. 87 of 2022, is dismissed as ‘nor pressed’.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand dismissed, being infructuous.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent Bank and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 13th February, 2023 14/ac
Bank of Baroda
Ms. S.R. Nirman Private Limited & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
