DRAT Mumbai allowed the Appellant Bank's application for condonation of a 73-day delay in filing an appeal. The order required payment of costs to the DRAT Bar Association within a week.
Condonation of 73 days delay allowed subject to payment of Rs. 15,000/- costs to DRAT Bar Association within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No.531/2022(CoD)
In Appeal on Diary No.895/2022
Between
Bank Of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s.
Varshaben Hitendra Kumar Gheewala …Respondent/s
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A. R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 12/06/2023:-
The Appellant Bank is in appeal impugning the judgment and order in Appeal No. 4/2022 on the files of D.R.T.-II, Ahmedabad, wherein the appeal was partly allowed. The Respondent who is a 3rd party to the proceedings had challenged the order of the Recovery Officer before the Presiding Officer D.R.T is also in appeal and has filed a separate appeal challenging the very same judgment and order. This appeal was filed challenging the order dated 07.03.2022 with a delay of 73 days.
1
Post on 20.06.2023 before Registrar for reporting compliance.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-11
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 73 days in filing the appeal against the impugned order.
Bank Of Baroda
Varshaben Hitendra Kumar Gheewala
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
