Anil Kuruvilla v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar order directing appellant to file affidavit of substituted service for R3 and serving documents to opposing counsel. Listed for counter arguments.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 535/2022
in A.IR:316/2022
Anil Kuruvilla V/S State Bank Of India & Ors
25/01/2023
Appellant Counsel files AOS in respect of R1 to R5.
R1, R2, R4 and R5 served.
R3 returned as ‘Door Locked’.
Appellant to file Affidavit of substituted service in respect of R3.
Representing counsel for B. Raghavulu Naidu files Vakalath in respect of R1 & R2.
None for R4.
Undertaking counsel Senthil Kumar undertakes to file Vakalath for R5.
Appellant counsel is directed to serve copy of Documents to R1,R2 and R5 counsel at the earliest.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
25 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court