Anil Kuruvilla v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim listing order in debt recovery appeal. Registrar directed parties to file documents and vacancies within specified timelines; no substantive disposal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 535/2022
In A.IR:316/2022
Anil Kuruvilla V/S State Bank Of India & Ors
28/02/2023
None for Appellant.
Representing counsel Bharathi for R1 and R2 present and informs that set of documents also not received.
Affidavit of substituted service in respect of R3 not yet filed.
Appellant instructed to serve set of Documents to R1 and R2 on priority within a week’s time and counter by R1 and R2, in 2 weeks thereafter.
Undertaking counsel for R5 present. seeks short time for filing Vakalath.
Call on 20/03/2023.for filing Vakalath.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kuruvilla
- respondent
State Bank Of India
- respondent
Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
25 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court