Listed appeal regarding time extension for filing reply. Court allowed additional time for second respondent and scheduled final hearing.
Reply filed within three weeks; rejoinder within four weeks; final hearing postponed to 14/04/2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 44/2022
Between
Manikchand Dewasi, Proprietor of M/s. Shree Ganesh Electrical & Plywood.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Canara Bank & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Ms. Aarti Suvarna, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Mittal Shroff, i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 31/01/2023:-
The reply has been filed by the second Respondent. The Ld. Counsel for the first Respondent Bank seeks further extension of time to file the reply.
The reply shall be filed by the first Respondent within three weeks positively.
Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within four weeks, thereafter. Post on 14.04.2023 for final hearing on appeal.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-18
1
Manikchand Dewasi
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
