Dismissed
Sicom Ltd. v. Official Liquidator of Aqua Logistics Ltd.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/36/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY ARPFLLATEItRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Wise Application Ho.
. of 20
In . ' — I. No. __________
Appeal No. : S<S of 2oX3 . -7 ;
... Appellants
(Advocate .
J. .
Versus
Respondents
76^
(Advocate ___
J
Date Office Notes, Appearances |
________ and Registrar’s order / Chairperson's Orders
H
b /
A /Avrwr ^cu's)
&
- f /ehk ■ 6h
O4-a' jA^l^ 7.
-A- -^4 r '
<2^/ag/W'3> ,
9-^SrV3- K
*
^<3 yv>— <^'1 'C\ | ko
M- I- '
Vo |
j
P.T.O.
j
4_L
Contd Sheet
| . Date | Office Notes, Appear **and Registrar’s order ****_I _Chairp** |
ances erson’s Orders |
|---|---|---|
| Adv. P'Kurr>a?r ToJn Actt ftdv- A/ehq fbTT p-l Adv FotT AppeJlonf A< da-ViV- pe-^r se^vicf' £2r'ce i£ CoroP1,6^, HdnJ deJW^pg bid p _<i P-3 . APPW?F^Fd-ed a /Vd aad^57 op nod'ce pcibs+i 'btJ-e "Xss^ by Pape'S" I ctpl li r O ppi d<xv dpop. R- F s^75->//4 pdbh'ca^O^ |
QpfVcJa'Y i p-l C-bYr\plcJ~^ • ■ , CA^P’;C<^'°n I- i'ce Kj O. oJ/ouJ-eJ ■ -vnct 1 ccH-0 |
|
| _\SI _12 AS /IF /Q-OF3 . ^dj Rpt P03/ Rpp |
^nce —37/_c ■ _^3 i's 'ir~" |
|
| I5-I2-2OZJ | Due to adtoihisltetive reason- the board is Discharged. Stand-Over to n -pz- |
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court