Punjab National Bank v. M/S Karan Cans Private Limited and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D^MSRlCqyERY APPEL.l|tE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAS
Mlsc Application No. . of 20 ,.No.
in
Appeal No. of 20
Pitnj&b ...Appellants
(Advocate
J
Versus
A//fef C(3r& . XV^- - ■ ...Reapondnnte
(Advocate
I,
t i
‘J h - ---------
□ate Office No- 1 as, Appearances
and Registrar’s orjdfjcler / Chalrperson’a Orders
Shtuic
(by
^on/^iS3 ^Ar'M). 3tlt/'Son za7
4-.
fijfrftfjaJ o^7
Q-lTcj
f&feesj. te-
(^( d-tf-W n
.
£. /Zs^Xy ixT-'
Mu- ktox&r ^s- (//V^ 1^
/4j/ xM*
II
-^r ‘ O$TV]
14^. U//r/^—| ' . ',
P.T.O.
| Date | ; Office Notos, Appearances and Registrar’s order _I _Chairperson's Orders |
|---|---|
| og/o^/^^s | ^1 / —x / _c- _Cs+^-q^ pespod^n)- : Re/^ly K (Adv. Sh'ZTUJ^Ka ^cidyAcw po^r P)pipelianX” Aav 5habr>am PesPoJ^n/o^ , PotT ppp^cx7rar,c< GS/OS _l'2-o'^ _ |
| Due toadministrative reason. board discharged. 2.6 -l o -2023 |
|
| 2(5/10/20^. | /) 2 /‘ZO -Z3 . H'me iPo^r P< )?nj Peplj ^/J2^O23. (NOr^e <“b?r Appe^0^ ' p^v- Shubham Fb^r P-4-' Norxe PoTroVbeTT PeS’pom pa-v- Fo^r p- <br>_ , t po5/Appe^-f^^ |
| 12/2023 | * ’. F\cK/. Ajikurrvrg- Fd^t AppeJlant-* pJv 5h(Abk>arY-i Rdtt R-q . INorxe fb?r oH-xeTT Respo r'^e-n 1- Appelia^v ’Piled <re?n6'ce af Pidavi'-F, p^c pea-5^8-vCce ccRPfdav/f sea-vice »S comp/<j^. uporx R-'Z. by **RPAO **bu> incorn ptej-e upct? _f}-& R-3 . Ar-h’ Fd-3- -Hxkfr'fl 5'4-ep'^ rp-a-su^sb-Ra-e S’cavic? HOJ r-DTj J . 10 /o ) /'20'ZCt- no+^’ce upo^’^-i £<^—j p "n"/^ - IQ _eg isi'&q'x _~ |
| * < |
<br>t A s •i |
- < s A ■t' ■ i- I
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court