Punjab National Bank v. Sri Sanjay Kumar Mookim
Case brief
What is this about?
The bench noted that the respondent had been served, no opposition was filed, and the case was listed for hearing of the appeal on 07.07.2023 without further adjournment.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl No. 34 of 2023
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
06.06.2023
A.O., Punjab National Bank & Anr. … Appellants Vs.
Sanjay Kumar Mookim
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Debasish Chakraborty, ld. counsel Mr. Sovan Kr. Dutta, ld. Counsel. For Respondent : None
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Perused records. It appears that on 22.02.2023 application for condonation of delay filed u/s 5 of the Limitation Act was allowed. Affidavit of service is on record which shows that respondent was served. Order dated 22.02.2023 further shows that Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel, appeared for the respondent, who is not present today. None is present for the respondent. Record shows that no opposition is filed by the respondent. Since respondent was served, no fresh notice is required to be served upon him.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.O., Punjab National Bank & Anr.
- respondent
Sanjay Kumar Mookim
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court