Samar Ghosh v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants the appellant one week time to file an affidavit of service after noting a newspaper cutting as evidence of notice publication. The appeal is listed for hearing on 07.07.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
MA Dy No. 376 of 2022
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
05.06.2023
Samar Ghosh & Anr.
… Appellants Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee, ld. Counsel Mr. Saptarshi Chakraborty, ld. Counsel. Ms. Tiyasa Ghosh, ld. counsel
For Respondent : Ms. Riya Paul, ld. Counsel. Dipak Kr. Chakraborty, ld. Counsel.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears that affidavit of service is not filed by the appellant, although learned counsel for the appellant has shown a newspaper cutting wherein a notice was published. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and granted one week time to file affidavit of service.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samar Ghosh & Anr
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 191090003762022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court