The Tribunal recorded vakalat on behalf of Respondent No.8, described the matter as analogous to a reserved appeal, heard counsel for respondents, and reserved judgment. No decision is rendered in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (CAMP-HYDERABAD)
(Appeal No.290 of 2018)
(Arising out of S.A. No.764 of 2013 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
26.06.2023
Union of India … Appellant
-Vs-
Housing & Urban Development Corporation(HUDCO) & Ors. … Respondents
None for Appellant Ms. Poetry Dyutta Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 Mr. Nemani Srinivas Learned Counsel for Respondents No.2 to 6 Mr.G. Sriram Learned Counsel for Respondent No.8
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Vakalat filed by Mr. G. Sriram, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.8 is taken on record. It is an analogous matter with Appeal No.28 of 2022, which has already been heard and reserved for judgment.
None for the Appellant. Heard Learned Counsels for the Respondents. Judgment reserved.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated 26th June, 2023
Union of India
Housing & Urban Development Corporation
Respondents No. 2 to 6
Respondent No. 8
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
