One judge DRAT allowed two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit for the appellants in Appeal No. 273 of 2018, with opposed rejoinder timelines fixed.
Two weeks time granted for filing supplementary affidavit with opposition and rejoinder timelines fixed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 273 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
10.10.2023
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. and Anr ... Appellants
-Vs-
Kuppili Satyabnarayana Bharani and Anr ……Respondents Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee, Learned Counsel, Mr. Rajiv Maity, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Gaurav Singh, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for and is granted two week’s time to file supplementary affidavit with copy to the Respondent who may file opposition within two weeks thereafter with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder if any, within a week thereafter.
List on 31st January, 2024.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 10th October, 2023 15/tp
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. and Anr
Kuppili Satyabnarayana Bharani and Anr
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
