Bank of Baroda v. M/s. S.M Associate
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal received an appeal under Section 18 of the SRFIAEE Act, 2002. The Tribunal noted the filing of the appeal fee and accepted jurisdiction, but found a defect requiring the deposit of an additional deficit court fee of Rs. 20,000.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy. No. 80/2023 Date: 06/02/2023
Bank of Baroda & Anr. ------------Appellants
Versus
M/s. S.M. Associates & 2 Ors. ------------Respondents
Received an application on 06/02/2023 filed online as well as hard copy on same date under Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Bikash Sharma.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Bank of Baroda & Anr. against the order dated 04/01/2023 passed in S.A. No. 97 of 2022 and S.A. No. 104 of 2022 in DRT- Guwahati. Application fees of Rs.30005/- vide Transaction Ref. ID 0602230011543 dt. 06.02.2023 has been paid through online along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 18 of the SRFIAEE Act, 2002 is within the limitation period.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
- respondent
M/s. S.M. Associates & 2 Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court