Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
A three-judge bench of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal concluded hearing a second appeal but has not delivered its judgment as recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 26 of 2021
(Arising out of Appeal 04 of 2018 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.02.2023 Anil Kumar Gupta … Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India & 4 Others … Respondents Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray with Ms. Sharmistha Poddar, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/Union Bank of India Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 3 and 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties at length. Hearing concluded. Judgment reserved.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson Dated: 13th February, 2023 13/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Kumar Gupta
- respondent
Union Bank of India
- respondent
4 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court