Smt Babita Jaiswal and Anr. v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear before the tribunal on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 248/2018 Date: 09.01.2023
Smt. Babita Jaiswal & Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: None for the appellants, Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
As per office report dated 06.01.2023, the written submissions have been filed on behalf of the appellants as well as the respondent no. 1, but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents no. 2 to 5 inspite of paper publication. The appeal is of year 2018.
Perusal of the earlier order dated 02.11.2022 of this Tribunal shows that none was present on behalf of the appellant on that date. Today also, none is present for the appellant, therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Smt. Babita Jaiswal & Anr.
Bank of Baroda & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court