Sri Kamal Jain and Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 236 of 2017
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.04.2023 Sri Kamal Jain & 3 Others … Appellants -VsAsset Reconstruction Company India Limited & 8 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 4/Punjab National Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 4 is taken on record. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within a period of three weeks.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that Respondent No. 1, i.e. Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited (ARCIL) has been shifted to a new address and prays time for serve notice at the new address.
Let notices be served upon Respondent No. 1 through speed post instead of paper publication, as was directed on 28th September, 2022.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court