Mita Chatterjee v. a O.Indian Bank. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing after recording a rejoinder file by the appellant and granting time to respondents to file an opposition.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 229 of 2017)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 422 of 2014 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.10.2023 Mita Chatterjee … Appellant -VsAuthorised Officer, Indian Bank & 3 Others … Respondent Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/Indian Bank
Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3 None for Respondent No. 1A/Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
None is present for Respondent No. 1A, Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited.
Rejoinder filed by the Appellant against the opposition filed by Respondent No. 3 is taken on record.
Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/Indian Bank, prays for and is granted three weeks time to file opposition with copy to Appellant who may file rejoinder, if any, within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mita Chatterjee
- respondent
Authorised Officer, Indian Bank
- respondent
2nd Respondent
- respondent
3rd Respondent
- respondent
Respondent No. 1A / Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court