Mita Chatterjee v. a O.Indian Bank. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata posted Appeal No. 229 of 2017 for hearing. It noted counsel instructions were lacking for Respondents 1 and 2, ordered fresh notices, recorded new opposition from Respondent No. 3, and listed the matter for hearing on October 16, 2023.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 229 of 2017
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.09.2023
Mita Chatterjee ... Appellants -VsA.O. Indian Bank and others ... Respondent
Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Sarmistha Pal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Bank. Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 3
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Perused the orders of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court dated 12.07.2023 passed in C.O. No. 3287 of 2022. In compliance of the orders of the Hon’ble High court, Respondent Nos.1 and 2 whose names were directed to be deleted by the order dated 31.08.2022 will continue to remain on record as Respondent No. 1 and 2. It is also recorded that name of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were not deleted from the array of parties. Hence, no fresh amendment is required.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 who was earlier representing them submits that now she has no instruction on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 after the order dated 31.08.2022. Accordingly, fresh notices be issued to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Affidavit of service be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mita Chatterjee
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court