The tribunal allowed the interventor's application to be impleaded as an additional Respondent with amendments, anticipating no objection.
I.A. 543/2022 allowed; intervener impleaded as additional Respondent; amendment carried out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 543/2022
In Appeal No. 1/2011
Between
Jayantilal Lunkad … Applicant/s in the matter of ... Appellant/s M/s Meeti Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/s. Dena Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Rahul M., Advocate for Appellant. R. Dube, Advocate for Applicant/Intervener.
-: Order dated: 17/01/2023:-
The learned counsel for the Appellant seeks further time to substitute the first Respondent bank.
No reply has been filed within three weeks as directed on I.A. 543/2022 which is an application filed by the intervener.
I assume that there is no objection forthcoming and hence, I.A. 543/2022 is allowed and the intervener is directed to be impleaded as an additional Respondent in this appeal in terms of prayer (A). The necessary amendment shall be carried out.
The other reliefs sought shall be determined in the Appeal in accordance with the pleadings taken.
Post on 17.02.2023 for compliance.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-14
1
Jayantilal Lunkad / M/s Meeti Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Dena Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
