DrAT allowed the appellant to engage counsel and listed the appeal for further proceedings on 19.09.2022 without disposal.
Appellant permitted to engage counsel; reply filed within four weeks; post 19.09.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 21/2016
Between
Shri. Kiran S/o Baburao Kulthe … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. Kiran B. Kulthe, Appellant present in Person.
Mr. Prajit S. S, bf for M/s. PRS Legal, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
-: Order dated: 14/07/2022:-
Appellant is present in person. There is no appearance for State Bank of India, Respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 is represented by a counsel.
Appellant who is present in person seeks further to engage a lawyer.
Appellant may engage counsel and get ready for hearing on the next date, positively.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to other sides.
Post on 19.09.2022 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-16
1
Shri Kiran S/o Baburao Kulthe
State Bank of India
Respondent No.2
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
