Mr. Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola v. Authorised Officer Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
IA filed for stay in an appeal before the DRT against a bank. The bench adjourned the hearing to 09.10.2023 and directed that any interim order shall continue till the next date.
What did the court decide?
Adjourned to 09.10.2023; direct that interim order, if any, shall continue till next date.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 258/2023(Stay) In Appeal on Diary No. 641/2023
Between
Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola
… Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr Rafeeq Peermohideen i/b M/s. T. N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr A.R. Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 27/07/2023:-
For hearing, adjourned to 09.10.2023.
Interim order, if any, shall continue till the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court