Mr. Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola v. Authorised Officer Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 258/2023 (Stay)
In
Appeal on Diary No. 641/2023
Between
Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorised Officer,
Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr T. N. Tripathi, i/b M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr A.R. Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Respondent Bank.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank submits
that the reply has been filed today and a copy of the same has already been served to the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant.
The possession of the property shall not be taken over without serving two weeks prior notice to the Appellant/Counsel. Adjourned to 24.05.2023 for hearing on the application for stay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surjitsinh Amarsinh Mangrola
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court