Canara Bank v. Woodman Venneers Pvt. Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 629/2022 (CoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 1320/2022
Between
The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank
… Appellant/s
V/s.
M/s. Woodman Veneers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms Vaishali Bhilare, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 03/01/2023:-
- The Respondent had appeared through counsel who proposed to file a Vakaltnama within a week and it was adjourned today for filing a reply. It seems that the Respondent has neither filed any Vakaltnama nor have they filed any reply to an application for condonation of delay.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court