Court ordered substitution of the expired respondent and listed the regular appeal for hearing on 18.05.2023 while continuing any interim order.
Order for substitution of respondent and listing of the appeal for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 09/2019 Date: 03.03.2023
Union Bank of India & Anr. Vs. M/s Pargana Danwar Food Processor Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri S. D. Sahai, counsel for the appellants-Bank, Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent-Borrower,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Borrower submits that his reply is ready and same shall be filed during course of the day. It has also been intimated that the respondent no. 4 has expired, detail of which has been provided by him.
Learned counsel for the appellant may file substitution application by the next date.
List this case on 18.05.2023. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Union Bank of India & Anr.
M/s Pargana Danwar Food Processor Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
