Chaitanya Janardhan Namburu v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 07 of 2015
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.04.2023
Namburu Venkata Narayana & Anr. … Appellants -VsKotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. … Respondents Mr. Prasenjit Pal, ld. Counsel for appellant. Mr. S.N.Bera, ld. counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and granted time to file substitution application for substituting legal heirs of appellant no.1, who has since been died. Learned counsel should file the substitution application after issuing notice to the respondent. He should also file affidavit of service.
List on 20.04.2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 12 April, 2023 07/pkb
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Namburu Venkata Narayana & Anr.
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court