The tribunal adjourned the appeal to post hearing as the matter could not be settled with Respondent No.4, despite settlements with other banks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 20/2016
Between
Shree Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahakari Sakhar Kharkana Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Gaurang Khinkhabwala, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/r. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.2
Ms. Shradha Patil, i/b M/s. India Law, Advocate for Respondent No.3
-: Order dated: 27/06/2023:-
It is submitted that the matter could not be settled with Respondent No. 4 although it has been settled with the rest of the Respondent Banks.
Hence, post on 21.08.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-15
1
Shree Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahakari Sakhar Kharkana Ltd.
The Maharashtra State Co-op Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
