Rbl Bank Limited v. Tech Hub Space Solution
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal admitted vakalats and service affidavits. It allowed the appellant to argue maintainability of the appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. It granted the respondent two weeks to file opposition.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 19 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.02.2023 M/s. RBL Bank Limited … Appellant -VsM/s. Tech Hub36 Space Solutions & 2 Others … Respondents Mr. Nimish Mishra with Mr. Rajeev Maity and Ms. K. Dev, Learned Counsel for Appellant
Mr. A. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/Lessee
Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Respondent No. 2 in person
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Vakalatnama filed by Respondent No. 1 is taken on record.
Affidavit-of-service filed is also taken on record.
Heard the Learned Counsel for the Appellant on the point of maintainability of the impugned order under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 prays for and is granted two weeks time to file opposition with advance copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of listing.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. RBL Bank Limited
- respondent
M/s. Tech Hub36 Space Solutions & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court