Disposed
Madan Lal Kesari v. Ashok Kumar Thakur and 2 Others
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/184/2018
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 184/2018 Date: 20.04.2023
Madan Lal Kesari Vs. Ashok Kumar Thakur & Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief Shri S. K. Prasad, counsel for the appellant, Shri Abdul Majeed, counsel for the respondent no. 1- Borrower,
None for the respondent nos. 2 & 3-Bank
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Prasad could not come from Patna on account of some personal reason, therefore, he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 18.07.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Madan Lal Kesari
Ashok Kumar Thakur
Respondent no. 2
Respondent no. 3
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court