The DRAT set the appeal ex parte and postponed it to 07.12.2023 for ex parte hearing as the respondent counsel had relinquished vakalat and no other counsel appeared.
The respondents were set ex parte and the matter was postponed to 07.12.2023 for ex parte hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 176/2012
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s.
M/s. Saroj Silk Mills & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Priyanka C., i/b M/s. Nahush Shah Legal, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 12/10/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents has already relinquished the Vakaltnama.
There is no other Counsel appearing for the Respondents.
Hence, Respondents are called absent and set ex-parte.
Post on 07.12.2023 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-24
1
1 issue framed by the court
whether to proceed with the appeal ex parte in the absence of respondent counsel
Bank of Baroda
M/s. Saroj Silk Mills & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
