Bank of Baroda v. M/S Saroj Silk Mills & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai adjourned an appeal due to a change in counsel for the appellant Bank, which sought time for instructions. No respondent appearance was recorded.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 176/2012
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s. M/s Saroj Silk Mills &Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Nahush Shah, i/b M/s. Nahush Shah Legal, Advocate for the Appellant.
Order dated: 04/07/2022:-
There is a change in Vakalatnama for the Appellant Bank. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Bank seeks an adjournment to get instruction from the Bank and get ready with arguments.
There is no appearance for the Respondents.
The notice shall be served on the Respondent’s counsel and the parties are directed to get ready for the hearing.
Post on 20.09.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-33
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
M/s Saroj Silk Mills &Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court