Bank of Baroda v. Dr Pranjivan Parshottam Zaveri and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order on list of applications in an appeal, prompting parties to file replies within two weeks and fixing a date for hearing.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 37/2023 In Appeal No. 17/2022
Between
Dr. Pranjivan Parshottam Zaveri and Ors. …Applicant/s (Respondent) In the matter between Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s. Dr. Pranjivan Parshottam Zaveri and Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Bhaskar Sharma, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Prashant Pandit, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent.
-: Order dated: 28/02/2023:-
Al the Respondents have been served. Respondents Nos. 1 & 2 have appeared. The rest of the Respondents have not appeared despite service and hence, Respondents Nos. 3 and 4 are called absent set exparte.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that he has already filed a reply on the regular appeal and he has also filed I.A. No. 37/2023 seeking a restoration of possession of the property as ordered by the D.R.T.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant Bank seeks time to file a reply on I.A. No. 37/2023.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within two weeks.
Reply to the stay application filed by the Appellant as I.A. No. 134/2022 shall also be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Dr. Pranjivan Parshottam Zaveri
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court