Single judge order granting the respondent a one-week extension to file opposition to a specified interim application in the main appeal, which is yet to be registered.
One week's time granted to the respondent to file opposition to I.A. 31 of 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 45 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
06.10.2023 Rudra Bhattacharya & Another … Appellants -VsAuthorised Officer, Bank of India & 4 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Rudra Bhattacharya, for Appellant in person
Mr. Sanjeev Das with Ms. Smriti Das Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 and 2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
At the very outset when a query is raised as to whether opposition is filed to the main appeal, Learned Counsel for Respondent submits that no opposition has been filed by them but the record shows that the opposition by Respondents No. 1 and 2 in Diary No. 45 of 2023, which is the main appeal and is yet to be registered, was filed on 16th June, 2023.
Counsel for Respondent prays for and is granted one week’s time, and no more, to file opposition to I.A. 31 of 2023.
List on 6th December, 2023 for disposal of I.A. 31 of 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 06th October, 2023
05/ac
Rudra Bhattacharya & Another
Authorised Officer, Bank of India & 4 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
