Shaik Mohiuddin v. City Union Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Regular Appeal Dy. No. 614 of 2023, Date 23/11/2023
ShaikMohiuddin-------- Appellant
Versus
City Union Bank Limited & Others ------- Respondent
Learned Advocate Mr. N. Srinivas appears on behalf of the Appellant.
None for the respondent.
It is to mention that on scrutiny of the case five defects were mentioned as per registry bench order dated 27/09/2023. Details of rectification of the defects as submitted by the Ld. Advocate for Appellant are as under.
As regards to defect No. (i) regarding court fee, Ld. Advocate Mr. N. Srinivas submitted on 03/10/2023that the Appellant is a third party, not a Certified Debtor & has filed the instant Appeal arising out of an Interim Application as such order does not determine any debts against the Appellant. Hence, Appellant filed this appeal with a fees of Rs. 250/-.
As regard to defect No.(ii) in respect of delay petition Ld. Advocate Mr.NemaniSrinivas submitted on 03/10/2023 that under section 4 of Limitation Act if 30 days falls on a holiday then the limitation period covered upto next working day of the court. He submits that in this case 30 days from the date of order excluding number of days taken by the DRT to issue/process the certified copy of the order, falls on 9th September 2023 (Saturday) which is a holiday for this Appellate Tribunal. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal was filed on 11th September 2023 (i.e. Monday, the next working day) through online and hence, the petition is within the limitation period.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ShaikMohiuddin
- respondent
City Union Bank Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court