The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata dismissed an appeal after hearing counsel for the appellant and respondent jointly submitted that the principal matter had been settled.
Appeal dismissed as the matter has been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 138 of 2017
(Arising out of S.A. 60 of 2016 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
02.03.2023 State Bank of India & Another … Appellants -VsReliance Asset Reconstruction (Earlier Indian Bank) & Another … Respondents Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhury with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Sumanta Sahu
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhury, Learned Counsel for Appellant as well as Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3 jointly submit that the matter has been settled.
In view of the above submission, the appeal, being Appeal No. 138 of 2017, is dismissed.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents
and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 2nd March, 2023 22/ac
State Bank of India
Reliance Asset Reconstruction
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
