Disposed
Ram Niwas Agarwal v. Punjab National Bank
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/125/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against an interlocutory order; notice given to parties; no substantive disposition.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 125 of 2018
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.06.2023 Ram Niwas Agarwal … Appellant -VsPunjab National Bank & 8 Others … Respondents Mr. Dipanjan Datta with Mr. Subhojit Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant is present. None is present for the Respondents despite service.
Perused the record. It appears that an appeal is filed against an interlocutory order. Learned Counsel for Appellant should file a status report of the pending O.A./S.A. List on 31st July, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 28th June, 2023 13/ac
Ram Niwas Agarwal
Punjab National Bank & 8 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court