The DAries allowed an appeal in default as no counsel appeared for the appellant, while the respondent was represented. Pending applications and interim orders were closed or vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 123 of 2016
(Arising out of M.A. 13 of 2011 in O.A. 29 of 2009 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
16.03.2023 Yenni Srinivas … Appellant -VsBank of Baroda … Respondent None for Appellant
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with Ms. Anindita Das, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list.
None appears to represent the Appellants while Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank are present.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Appeal No. 123 of 2016, stands dismissed in default.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 16th March, 2023 01/ac
Yenni Srinivas
Bank of Baroda
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
