Presidential order regarding an appeal and an impleadment application in a DRT matter. The bench heard arguments but reserved judgment without issuing a decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 121 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 166 of 2019 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
11.04.2023 Mennonite Brethren Property Association of India Private Limited … Appellant -VsPunjab National Bank & 12 Others ... Respondents Mr. Assad Hussain with Ms. Ansumala Bansal and Ms. Prarthana Singha Roy, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3/Banks Mr. K. Partha Sarthi Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 5, 11 to 13
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties on the Impleadment Application (I.A. 118 of 2023) as well as the appeal.
At this stage Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the impleadment application be decided first. Since argument is heard on the application as well as appeal, judgment is reserved.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 11th April, 2023
15/ac
Mennonite Brethren Property Association of India Private Limited
Punjab National Bank & 12 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
