The ATR Kolkata allowed an adjournment in Appeal No. 112 of 2022, listing it for the third time part heard. Respondents were granted six weeks to file a reply to a supplementary affidavit.
Granted six weeks time to file reply to supplementary affidavit; adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 112 of 2022
(Arising out of APP No. 01 of 2012 in R.P. 44 of 2009 in I.A. 1025 of 2019, DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
18.04.2023 High Rank Estate Advisory Private Limited … Appellant -VsRajesh Kumar Gupta & 4 Others ... Respondents
Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned Senior Counsel with Mr. Ajit Keshari, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. Prasenjit Pal with Mr. Someshwar Chakrabarti, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 4
Ms. Poetry Dutta, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.5/BOI
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It is a part heard matter wherein argument by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant has also been heard. Thereafter a supplementary affidavit is being filed along with two documents.
Supplementary affidavit filed by the Appellant today is taken on record. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that e-filing of supplementary affidavit will be done in course of the day.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents No. 1 to 4 prays for and is granted to six weeks time to file reply to the supplementary affidavit with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder, if any, within a week thereafter.
List on 7th June, 2023 as ‘Part Heard’.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 18th April, 2023 17/ac
High Rank Estate Advisory Private Limited
Rajesh Kumar Gupta & 4 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
