M/s Samskriti v. Ms Sugan Pharma Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
LIST Order adjourning hearing to 28 June 2023 and granting four weeks to respondent to file opposition.
What did the court decide?
Four weeks time granted to respondent to file opposition; appellant to file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 256 of 2021)
(Arising out of M.A. No. 35 of 2015 in S.A. No. 240 of 2018 DRT - Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
17.04.2023 M/s Samskriti, a partnership firm represented by its Managing Partner Mr. Devineni Vara Krishna Ram … Appellant -VsM/s Sugun Pharma Ltd. ….Respondents Mr. M. Narasimha Rao, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 prayed for and is granted four week’s time to file opposition with copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 28th June, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 17th April, 2023 12/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Samskriti
- respondent
M/s Sugun Pharma Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court