Idbi Bank v. Ms D P Agro Mills Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application to condone delay in filing an appeal in default due to the appellant's non-appearance, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.
What did the court decide?
Application for condonation of delay dismissed; appeal dismissed as time-barred.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 204 of 2022
(Arising out of I.A. 1304 of 2021 in S.A. 162 of 2019 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.04.2023 IDBI Bank Limited … Appellant -VsM/s. D.P. Agro Mills Private Limited & 2 Others ... Respondents
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Learned Counsel for Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present to represent the Appellant while Learned Counsel for the Respondents is present.
I.A. 131 of 2022
The instant application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. Since none is present to press the application, I.A. 131 of 2022, is dismissed in default.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Diary No. 204 of 2022, also stands dismissed as time barred.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
IDBI Bank Limited
- respondent
D.P. Agro Mills Private Limited
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090002042022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court