The Tribunal noted the appellant's absence despite being interested in lingering the proceeding. This order in default granted another opportunity to argue the matter and listed the appeal for hearing on 22.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 104 of 2018
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
15.12.2023
G. Basavaraj & Ors.
… Appellants Vs.
Sri Mahayogi Lakshmamma Coop. Bank Ltd. & Anr.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. A. K. Roy, ld. Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Nemani Srinivas, ld. Adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. A.K.Roy, ld. Advocate, representing learned counsel for the appellant Ms. Sonal Agarwal, ld. Adv. submits that Ms. Agarwal is on her way to argue the matter. The matter is taken up in the revised list. Even then learned counsel for the appellant is not present. Record shows that appellant is interested in lingering the proceeding. This appeal deserves to be dismissed in default, however, in the interest of justice another opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the matter.
List the matter on 22.01.2024 for hearing of appeal. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted on any ground whatsoever.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 15.12.2023 21 /pkb
G. Basavaraj & Ors.
Sri Mahayogi Lakshmamma Coop. Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
