State Bank of India v. Vms Nirman Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
List order for hearing of an appeal arising from a DRT order. The respondent was granted two weeks to file opposition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 10 of 2022) (Arising out of O.A. No. 103 of 2018 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
14.03.2023
The A.O. SBI & ors … Appellant -VsSmt. VMS Nirman Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondents
Mr. S. Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel, Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Respondent prays for and is granted two week’s time to file the opposition with advance copy to the Appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 26th June, 2023 for hearing of Appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.O. SBI & ors
- respondent
Smt. VMS Nirman Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court