Ramadevi R. Prajapati v. Idfc First Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal allowed on deposit by appellant of second instalment of constitutional requirement amount within granted time.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was allowed due to the payment of the second instalment of the pre-deposit amount.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal on Diary No.249/2023
Between
Ramadevi R. Prajapati … Appellant/s
V/s.
IDFC First Bank Ltd. …Respondent/s Mr. R. L. Motwani, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 06/03/2023:-
The Appellant was directed to deposit the second instalment of pre-deposit on or before 27.02.2023 and it is submitted that Hon’ble High Court had granted four days’ time to deposit the said amount. Accordingly, the amount has been deposited on 02.03.2023 and hence, the payment of the second instalment has complied.
For compliance with the third instalment, post on 28.03.2023.
mks-8
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramadevi R. Prajapati
- respondent
IDFC First Bank Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 271090002492023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court