indiabulls housing finance limited v. Royal Traders
Case brief
What is this about?
IRAT allowed condonation of delay for filing a reply in an appeal.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay in filing reply to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 144/2023 (CoD in Reply)
In
I.A. No.83/2023 (CoD)
In
Appeal on Diary No.1311/2022
Between
Royal Traders In the matter of Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.
…Applicant (Org.Respondent ) … Appellant/s
V/s.
Royal Traders …Respondent/s
Mr Sidharth Samntary along with Mr Ratnakar Singh, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent.
Mr Rishabh Shah along with Mr Divyanshu Gupta, i/b M/s. Parinam Law Associates, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 06/03/2023:-
A reply has been filed on the application for condonation of delay which was filed out of time.
The same is permitted to be filed and the delay in filing the reply is condoned.
There are some defects pointed out by the office which shall be cured.
Post on 16.03.2023 for hearing on I.A. No. 83/2023 i.e. an application for condonation of delay.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-2
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the reply to the appeal.
Royal Traders
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court