Ram Mehar Singh Dhaka And Anr. Since Deceased Represented through Lrs v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Appeal No. 1133/2023
Ld. Registrar
Date:28/11/2023
- Ram Mehar Singh Dhaka having registered office at Rajendra Nagar Ghaziabad
... Appellant
--Vs--
- KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED having office at ghaziabad
... Respondents
For the appellants : Anup Prakash Shukla For the respondents: Deepak Maurya
Ld. Counsel for the appellant Shri Anup Prakash Shukla is present and prays that appellant never got served notice u/s 13(2) and 13(4), which is mentioned in appeal at para 5.
Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks further time for removal of remaining defects.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram Mehar Singh Dhaka
- respondent
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Coram
Ld. Registrar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 091090011332023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court