Rakesh Gupta and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
An order granting time to appealants to file a substitution application to bring the legal heirs of an expired respondent on record and listing the appeal for future hearing.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to file substitution application; case listed for 02.05.2023.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 34/2020 Date: 14.03.2023
Rakesh Gupta and Anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellants, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellants are tenants in the present appeal, therefore, no pre-deposit amount is required to be made in the present case.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser contends that his reply is already on record. He further states that the respondent no. 5 has expired.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for some time to file substitution application to bring the legal heirs of the respondent no. 5 on record. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 02.05.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rakesh Gupta and Anr.
- respondent
Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090000342020
- Topic
- Landlord and Tenant
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court