Rajesh Kumar Mishra v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Allahabad High Court dismissed this appeal filed under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act after admitting procedural requirements, noting no pre-deposit was made and fixing the matter for orders.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1219/2022
(Rajesh Kumar Mishra Vs. Bank of Baroda)
Date: 10.01.2023
Shri W.A. Siddiqui, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present. Ld. Counsel filled affidavit in support of appeal and certified copy of the impugned order. Ld. Counsel also removed other defects. Defects reconciled. Proper court fee paid.
No pre deposit has been made. Waiver Application has been filed. As per the Possession Notice (page 36 of instant Appeal) dues as on 01.08.2019 was Rs. 64,54,261/- + interest. Ld. Counsel states that he will argue this issue before Hon’ble Court.
The instant Appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against interim order dated 23.12.2022 of DRT, Allahabad in S.A. No. 70/2021. Urgency Application (I.A. No. 756/2022), Waiver Application (I.A. No. 757/2022) and Stay Application (I.A. No. 758/2022) have been filed along with the Appeal.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 17 .01.2023 for orders.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajesh Kumar Mishra
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 091090012192022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court