Mrs Yasmeen Basheer Vakil v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 294 of 2023)
(Arising out of M.A. No.64 of 2019 in O.A. No. 1003 of 2018 in DRT-2 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
12.05.2023 Mrs. Yasmeen Basheer Vakil … Appellant -VsKotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & ors ..…Respondent Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Indradeep Basu, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
I.A. No. 184 of 2023 application under Section 5 of the limitation Act for condonation of delay of 13 days.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent opposed the prayer.
Having gone through the record I found the ground to be sufficient. Accordingly, delay in filing the Appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 184 of 2023 application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed.
I.A. No. 185 of 2023 waiver application. Opposition may be filed within three weeks with copy to the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within a week thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Yasmeen Basheer Vakil
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court