Mrs. Hema D. Katariya v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order is hearing disposal where the respondent was granted two weeks time to file a Vakaltnama, reply to the I.A. for waiver of predeposit, and the statement of account.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 109/2023 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 59/2023
Between
Hema Dinesh Katariya & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Vandan Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Ketaki Rege, i/b Ms. Sandhya S., Advocate for Respondent.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a Praecipe filed by the Appellant seeking urgent relief.
Adv. Ketaki Rege along with Ms. Sandhya S. propose to appear for Respondent Bank and seeks time to file a Vakaltnama and reply to I.A. No. 109/2023 which is an application for waiver of predeposit.
Reply together with the statement of account shall be filed within two weeks.
Post on 10.03.2023 for hearing on I.A. No.109/2023 (WoD) Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hema Dinesh Katariya
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 271090000592023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court